{"id":32,"date":"2021-03-15T11:05:30","date_gmt":"2021-03-15T11:05:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/?page_id=32"},"modified":"2021-11-17T04:41:53","modified_gmt":"2021-11-17T04:41:53","slug":"community-education","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/community-education\/","title":{"rendered":"Community Education"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Greetings. Following is our Top Study Materials and findings from Medical, Science and ScioEconomic Professionals. Listing Date: 11\/17\/21<\/p>\n\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-code\"><code><strong>Covid Jab Is Far More Dangerous than Advertised. Dr. Peter McCullough<\/strong><\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-rumble-com wp-block-embed-rumble-com\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" title=\"Nov 10, 21 JoCo Commissioner Fowler respondes to Comments re experimental mRNA Child Vaccines\" src=\"https:\/\/rumble.com\/embed\/vmmff0\/?pub=rh1n6#?secret=DfqPCwxxjZ\" data-secret=\"DfqPCwxxjZ\" width=\"1668\" height=\"932\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Covid Jab Is Far More Dangerous than Advertised. Dr. Peter McCullough<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/author\/dr-mercola\">Dr. Joseph Mercola<\/a> Global Research<br>November 17, 2021<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2021\/11\/16\/covid-vaccine-deaths.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">Mercola<\/a>Region:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/region\/usa\">USA<\/a>Theme:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/theme\/media-disinformation\">Media Disinformation<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/theme\/science-and-medicine\">Science and Medicine<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/covid-jab-far-more-dangerous-than-advertised\/5761826?utm_campaign=magnet&amp;utm_source=article_page&amp;utm_medium=related_articles#\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/covid-vaccine-400x215.png\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>All Global Research articles&nbsp;can be read in 51 languages by activating the \u201cTranslate Website\u201d&nbsp;drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To receive Global Research\u2019s Daily Newsletter (selected articles),&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/lp.constantcontactpages.com\/su\/IJiNQuW?EMAIL=&amp;go.x=0&amp;go.y=0&amp;go=GO\">click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Visit and follow us on Instagram at @<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/crg_globalresearch\/\">crg_globalresearch<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>***<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>According to a September 2021 analysis, based on conservative, best-case scenarios, the COVID shots have killed five times more seniors (65+) than the infection<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>In younger people and children, the risk associated with the COVID shot, compared to the risk of COVID-19, is bound to be even more pronounced<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Data show higher vaccination rates do not translate into lower COVID-19 case rates<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The COVID shots are an epic failure. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports having more than 30,000 spontaneous reports of either hospitalizations and\/or deaths among the fully vaccinated; data from the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services show 300,000 vaccinated CMS recipients have been hospitalized with breakthrough infections; 60% of seniors over age 65 hospitalized for COVID-19 have been vaccinated<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>50% of reported deaths after COVID-19 \u201cvaccination\u201d occur within 24 hours; 80% occur within the first week. According to one report, 86% of deaths have no other explanation aside from a vaccine adverse event. A Scandinavian study concluded about 40% of post-jab deaths among seniors in assisted living homes are directly due to the injection<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>October 26, 2021,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/video-the-vaccine-is-more-dangerous-than-covid-19-dr-peter-mccullough\/5759522\">Global Research published an interview with Dr. Peter McCullough<\/a>, in which he reviews and explains the findings of a September 2021 study published in the journal Toxicology Reports, which states:<sup>1<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cA novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>McCullough has impeccable academic credentials. He\u2019s an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and a full professor of medicine at Texas A&amp;M College of Medicine in Dallas. He also has a master\u2019s degree in public health and is known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States, in addition to being the editor of two medical journals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Authors Defend Their Paper<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not surprisingly, the Toxicology Reports paper has received scathing critique from certain quarters. Still, corresponding author Ronald Kostoff told Retraction Watch that the criticism has actually been \u201can extremely small fraction\u201d of the overall response, which by and large has been overwhelmingly positive and supportive. Kostoff went on to say:<sup>2<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cGiven the blatant censorship of the mainstream media and social media, only one side of the COVID-19 \u2018vaccine\u2019 narrative is reaching the public. Any questioning of the narrative is met with the harshest response \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I went into this with my eyes wide open, determined to identify the truth, irrespective of where it fell. I could not stand idly by while the least vulnerable to serious COVID-19 consequences were injected with substances of unknown mid and long-term safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We published a best-case scenario. The real-world situation is far worse than our best-case scenario, and could be the subject of a future paper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What these results show is that we 1) instituted mass inoculations of an inadequately-tested toxic substance with 2) non-negligible attendant crippling and lethal results to 3) potentially prevent a relatively small number of true COVID-19 deaths. In other words, we used a howitzer where an accurate rifle would have sufficed!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>COVID Jab Campaign Has Had No Discernible Impact<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Certainly, data very clearly show the mass \u201cvaccination\u201d campaign has not had a discernible impact on global death rates. On the contrary, in some cases the death toll shot up after the COVID shots became widely available. You can browse through&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/covid19.healthdata.org\/global?view=cumulative-deaths&amp;tab=trend\">covid19.healthdata.org<\/a><sup>3<\/sup>&nbsp;to see this for yourself. Several examples are also included at the very beginning of the video.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This trend has also been confirmed in a September 2021 study<sup>4<\/sup>&nbsp;published in the European Journal of Epidemiology. It found COVID-19 case rates are completely unrelated to vaccination rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Using data available as of September 3, 2021, from Our World in Data for cross-country analysis, and the White House COVID-19 Team data for U.S. counties, the researchers investigated the relationship between new COVID-19 cases and the percentage of the population that had been fully vaccinated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sixty-eight countries were included. Inclusion criteria included second dose vaccine data, COVID-19 case data and population data as of September 3, 2021. They then computed the COVID-19 cases per 1 million people for each country, and calculated the percentage of population that was fully vaccinated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to the authors, there was \u201cno discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last seven days.\u201d If anything, higher vaccination rates were associated with a slight increase in cases. According to the authors:<sup>5<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c[T]he trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.\u201d<strong>The Kostoff Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Getting back to the Toxicology Reports paper,<sup>6<\/sup>&nbsp;which is being referring to as \u201cthe Kostoff analysis,\u201d McCullough says the analysis is definitely making news in clinical medicine. The paper focuses on two factors: assumptions and determinism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Determinism describes how likely something is. For example, if a person takes a COVID shot, it\u2019s 100% certain they got the injection. It\u2019s not 50% or 75%. It\u2019s an absolute certainty. As a result, that person has a 100% chance of being exposed to whatever risk is associated with that shot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On the other hand, if a person says no to the injection, it\u2019s not 100% chance they\u2019ll get COVID-19, let alone die from it. You have a less than 1% chance of being exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and getting sick. So, it\u2019s 100% deterministic that taking the shot exposes you to the risks of the shot, and less than 1% deterministic that you\u2019ll get COVID if you don\u2019t take the shot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The other part of the equation is the assumptions, which are based on calculations using available data, such as pre-COVID death statistics and death reports filed with the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reports System (VAERS).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Mortality Data<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As noted by McCullough, two reports have detailed COVID jab death data, showing 50% of deaths occur within 24 hours and 80% occur within the first week. In one of these reports, 86% of deaths were found to have no other explanation aside from a vaccine adverse event. McCullough also cites a Scandinavian study that concluded about 40% of post-jab deaths among seniors in assisted living homes are directly due to the injection. He also cites other eye-opening figures:<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/government-scrubs-stats-vaccine-related-deaths\/5745606\">COVID-19 Vaccines are Killing \u201cHuge Numbers\u201d of People: Government Scrubs Stats on Vaccine-Related Deaths<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention reports having more than 30,000 spontaneous reports of either hospitalizations and\/or deaths among the fully vaccinated<\/li><li>Data from the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services show 300,000 vaccinated CMS recipients have been hospitalized with breakthrough infections<\/li><li>60% of seniors over age 65 hospitalized for COVID-19 have been vaccinated<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>COVID Shots Are \u2018Failing Wholesale\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWhen we put all these data together, we have clear-cut science that the vaccines are failing wholesale,\u201d McCullough says. The shots are particularly useless in seniors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Again, based on a best-case conservative scenario, seniors are five times more likely to die from the shot than they are from the natural infection. This scenario includes the assumption that the PCR test is accurate and reported COVID deaths were in fact due to COVID-19, which we know is not the case, and the assumption that the shots actually prevent death, which we have no proof of.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All things considered, you are FAR better off taking your chances with the natural infection, as McCullough says. The Kostoff analysis also does not take into account the fact that there are safe and effective treatments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It bases its assumptions on the notion that there aren\u2019t any. It also doesn\u2019t factor in the fact that the COVID shots are utterly ineffective against the Delta and other variants. If you take into account vaccine failure against variants and alternative treatments, it skews the analysis even further toward natural infection being the safest alternative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>FDA and CDC Should Not Run Vaccine Programs<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the CDC claim not a single death following COVID inoculation was caused by the shot, they should not be the ones making that determination, as they are both sponsoring the vaccination campaign.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They have an inherent bias. When you conduct a trial, you would never allow the sponsor to tell you whether the product was the cause of death, because you know they\u2019re biased.We have actually fulfilled all of the Bradford Hill criteria. I\u2019ll tell you right now that COVID-19 vaccine is, from an epidemiological perspective, causing these deaths or a large fraction. ~ Dr. Peter McCullough<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What we need is an external group, a critical event committee, to analyze the deaths being reported, as well as a data safety monitoring board. These should have been in place from the start, but were not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Had they been, the program would most likely have been halted in February, as by then the number of reported deaths, 186, already exceeded the tolerable threshold of about 150 (based on the number of injections given). Now, we\u2019re well over 17,000.<sup>7<\/sup>&nbsp;There\u2019s no normal circumstance under which that would ever be allowed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe CDC and FDA are running the [vaccination] program. They are NOT the people who typically run vaccine programs,\u201d McCullough says. \u201cThe drug companies run vaccine programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When Pfizer, Moderna, J&amp;J ran their randomized trials, we didn\u2019t have any problems. They had good safety oversight. They had data safety monitoring boards. The did OK. I mean I have to give the drug companies [credit].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But the drug companies are now just the suppliers of the vaccine. Our government agencies are now just running the program. There\u2019s no external advisory committee. There\u2019s no data safety monitoring board. There\u2019s no human ethics committee. NO one is watching out for this!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And so, the CDC and FDA pretty clearly have their marching orders: \u2018Execute this program; the vaccine is safe and effective.\u2019 They\u2019re giving no reports to Americans. No safety reports. We needed those once a month. They haven\u2019t told doctors which is the best vaccine, which is the safest vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They haven\u2019t told us what groups are to watch out for. How to mitigate risks. Maybe there are drug interactions. Maybe it\u2019s people with prior blood clotting problems or diabetes. They\u2019re not telling us anything!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They literally are blindsiding us, and with no transparency, and Americans now are scared to death. You can feel the tension in America. People are walking off the job. They don\u2019t want to lose their jobs, but they don\u2019t want to die of the vaccine! It\u2019s very clear. They say, \u2018Listen, I don\u2019t want to die. That\u2019s the reason I\u2019m not taking the vaccine.\u2019 It\u2019s just that clear.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Bradford Hill Criteria Are Met \u2014 COVID Jabs Cause Death<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>McCullough goes on to explain the Bradford Hill criterion for causation, which is one of the ways by which we can actually determine that, yes, the shots are indeed killing people. We\u2019re not dealing with coincidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe first question we\u2019d ask is: \u2018Does the vaccine have a mechanism of action, a biological mechanism of action, that can actually kill a human being?\u2019 And the answer is yes! because the vaccines all use genetic mechanisms to trick the body into making the lethal spike protein of the virus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is very conceivable that some people take up too much messenger RNA; they produce a lethal spike protein in sensitive organs like the brain or the heart or elsewhere. The spike protein damages blood vessels, damages organs, causes blood clots. So, it\u2019s well within the mechanism of action that the vaccine could be fatal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Someone could have a fatal blood clot. They could have fatal myocarditis. The FDA has official warnings of myocarditis. They have warnings on blood clots. They have warnings on a fatal neurologic condition called Guillain-Barr\u00e9 syndrome. So, the FDA warnings, the mechanism of action, clearly say it\u2019s possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The second criteria is: \u2018Is it a large effect?\u2019 And the answer is yes! This is not a subtle thing. It\u2019s not 151 versus 149 deaths. This is 15,000 deaths. So, it\u2019s a very large effect size, a large effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The third [criteria] is: \u2018Is it internally consistent?\u2019 Are you seeing other things that could potentially be fatal in VAERS? Yes! We\u2019re seeing heart attacks. We\u2019re seeing strokes. We\u2019re seeing myocarditis. We\u2019re seeing blood clots, and what have you. So, it\u2019s internally consistent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2018Is it externally consistent?\u2019 That\u2019s the next criteria. Well, if you look in the MHRA, the yellow card system in England, the exact same thing has been found. In the EudraVigilance system in [Europe] the exact same thing\u2019s been found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, we have actually fulfilled all of the Bradford Hill criteria. I\u2019ll tell you right now that COVID-19 vaccine is, from an epidemiological perspective, causing these deaths or a large fraction.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Zero Tolerance for Elective Drugs Causing Death<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There may be cases in which a high risk of death from a drug might be acceptable. If you have a terminal incurable disease, for example, you may be willing to experiment and take your chances. Under normal circumstances however, lethal drugs are not tolerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After five suspected deaths, a drug will receive a black box warning. At 50 deaths, it will be removed from the market. Considering COVID-19 has a less than 1% risk of death across age groups, the tolerance for a deadly remedy is infinitesimal. At over 17,000 reported deaths, which in real numbers may exceed 212,000,<sup>8<\/sup>&nbsp;the COVID shots far surpass any reasonable risk to protect against symptomatic COVID-19. As noted by McCullough:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThere is zero tolerance for electively taking a drug or a new vaccine and then dying! There\u2019s zero tolerance for that. People don\u2019t weigh it out and say, \u2018Oh well, I\u2019ll take my chances and die.\u2019 And I can tell you, the word got out about vaccines causing death in early April [2021], and by mid-April the vaccination rates in the United States plummeted \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We hadn\u2019t gotten anywhere near our goals. Remember, President Biden set a goal [of 70% vaccination rate] by July 1. We never got there because Americans were frightened by their relatives, people in their churches and their schools dying after the vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They had heard about it, they saw it. There was an informal internet survey done several months ago, where 12% of Americans knew somebody who had died after the vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I\u2019m a doctor. I\u2019m an internist and cardiologist. I just came from the hospital \u2026 I had a woman die of the COVID-19 vaccine \u2026 She had shot No. 1. She had shot No. 2. After shot No. 2, she developed blood clots throughout her body. She required hospitalization. She required intravenous blood thinners. She was ravaged. She had neurologic damage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After that hospitalization, she was in a walker. She came to my office. I checked for more blood clots. I found more blood clots. I put her back on blood thinners. I saw her about a month later. She seemed like she was a little better. Family was really concerned. The next month I got called by the Dallas Coroner office saying she\u2019s found dead at home.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of us don\u2019t have any problem with vaccines; 98% of Americans take all the vaccines \u2026 I think most people who are still susceptible would take a COVID vaccine if they knew they weren\u2019t going to die of it or be injured. And because of these giant safety concerns, and the lack of transparency, we\u2019re at an impasse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We\u2019ve got a very labor-constrained market. We\u2019ve got people walking off the job. We\u2019ve got planes that aren\u2019t going to fly, and it\u2019s all because our agencies are not being transparent and honest with America about vaccine safety.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Early Treatment Is Crucial, Vaxxed or Not<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As noted by McCullough, the vast majority of patients require hospitalization for COVID-19 is because they\u2019ve not received any treatment and the infection has been allowed free reign for days on end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cTo this day, the patients who get hospitalized are largely those who receive no early care at home,\u201d he says. \u201cThey\u2019re either denied care or they don\u2019t know about it, and they end up dying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The vast majority of people who die, die in the hospital; they don\u2019t die at home. And the reason why they end up in the hospital, it\u2019s typically two weeks of lack of treatment. You can\u2019t let a fatal illness brew for two weeks at home with no treatment, and then start treatment very late in the hospital. It\u2019s not going to work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There\u2019s been a very good set of analyses, one in the Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases \u2026 that showed, day by day, one loses the opportunity of reducing the hospitalization when monoclonal antibodies are delayed \u2026 No doctor should be considered a renegade when they order FDA [emergency use authorized] monoclonal antibody. The monoclonal antibodies are just as approved as the vaccines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I just had a patient over the weekend, fully vaccinated, took the booster. A month after the booster she went on a trip to Dubai. She just came back, and she got COVID-19! \u2026 I got her a monoclonal antibody infusion that day. [The following day] she started the sequence of multidrug therapy for COVID-19. I am telling you, she is going to get through this illness in a few days \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Podcaster Joe Rogan just went through this. Governor Abbott was also a vaccine failure. He went through it. Former President Trump went through it. Americans should see the use of monoclonal antibodies in high risk patients, followed by drugs in an oral sequenced approach. This is standard of care!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is supported by the Association of Physicians and Surgeons, the Truth for Health Foundation, the American Front Line Doctors, and the Front Line Critical Care Consortium. This is not renegade medicine. This is what patients should have. This is the correct thing!&nbsp;\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If we can\u2019t get the monoclonal antibodies, we certainly use hydroxychloroquine, supported by over 250 studies, ivermectin, supported by over 60 studies, combined with azithromycin or doxycycline, inhaled budesonide \u2026 full-dose aspirin \u2026 nutraceuticals including zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, quercetin, NAC \u2026 we do oral and nasal decontamination with povidone-iodine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In acutely sick patients we do it every four hours, [and it] massively reduces the viral load \u2026 Fortunately, we have enough doctors now and enough patient awareness, patients who \u2026 understand that early treatment is viable, is necessary, and it should be executed.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><sup>1,<\/sup>&nbsp;<sup>6<\/sup>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S221475002100161X\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Toxicology Reports September 2021; 8: 1665-1684<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><sup>2<\/sup>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2021\/10\/04\/author-defends-paper-claiming-covid-19-vaccines-kill-five-times-more-people-over-65-than-they-save\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Retraction Watch October 4, 2021<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><sup>3<\/sup>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/covid19.healthdata.org\/global?view=cumulative-deaths&amp;tab=trend\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Covid19.healthdata.org<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><sup>4,<\/sup>&nbsp;<sup>5<\/sup>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10654-021-00808-7#Sec4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">European Journal of Epidemiology September 30, 2021<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><sup>7<\/sup>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/openvaers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">OpenVAERS Data as of October 15, 2021<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><sup>8<\/sup>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.skirsch.io\/vaccine-resources\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">SKirsch.io\/vaccine-resources<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Featured image is from&nbsp;TrialSiteNews<\/em>The original source of this article is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2021\/11\/16\/covid-vaccine-deaths.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Mercola<\/a>Copyright \u00a9&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/author\/dr-mercola\">Dr. Joseph Mercola<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2021\/11\/16\/covid-vaccine-deaths.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Mercola<\/a>, 2021<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Greetings. Following is our Top Study Materials and findings from Medical, Science and ScioEconomic Professionals. Listing Date: 11\/17\/21 Covid Jab Is Far More Dangerous than Advertised. Dr. Peter McCullough By&nbsp;Dr. Joseph Mercola Global ResearchNovember 17, 2021MercolaRegion:&nbsp;USATheme:&nbsp;Media Disinformation,&nbsp;Science and Medicine All Global Research articles&nbsp;can be read in 51 languages by activating the \u201cTranslate Website\u201d&nbsp;drop down menu [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"template\/fullwidth.php","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1080,"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32\/revisions\/1080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ivemedia.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}